Filters
Question type

Study Flashcards

What did the court in the case in the text, Labriola v. Pollard Group, Inc., rule regarding whether the noncompete agreement at issue in the case was enforceable?


A) The court ruled that the noncompete agreement was enforceable because the employee received independent consideration for it in the form of increased wages.
B) The court ruled that the noncompete agreement was enforceable because the employee received independent consideration for it in the form of a fixed term of employment.
C) The court ruled that the noncompete agreement was enforceable because the employee received independent consideration for it in the form of a promotion.
D) The court ruled that the noncompete agreement was unenforceable because the employee did not have sufficient education to understand it.
E) The court ruled that the noncompete agreement was not enforceable because of a lack of consideration.

F) D) and E)
G) A) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Courtney, who does not keep up with the price of current technology, agrees to buy a used computer from Jake for $2,500. Later, Brice tells Courtney that she made a really bad deal and that she could get an even better new computer for no more than $1,000. Courtney tells Jake that she is not giving him any money because he was not fair with her. Which of the following is the most likely result if Jake sues Courtney alleging breach of contract?


A) Brice will win only if he can establish that Brice is wrong and that the deal was actually reasonable.
B) Brice will win because the court would not weigh whether a good bargain was made.
C) Courtney will win if she can establish that she paid at least 75% more than the computer was actually worth.
D) Courtney will win if she can establish that she paid at least 50% more than the computer was actually worth.
E) Courtney will win if she can establish that she made a bad deal and that truly she was not aware of current prices of computers.

F) C) and D)
G) A) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In a unilateral contract, the consideration for a promise is _____________.


A) An Act.
B) A return promise.
C) An acknowledgement.
D) A Consideration.
E) An agreement.

F) A) and E)
G) B) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

An illusory promise is not consideration.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A promise to do something that you are already obligated to do is generally valid consideration.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is an exception to the rule requiring consideration?


A) Promissory agreement.
B) Promissory estoppel.
C) Quasi estoppel.
D) Quasi agreement.
E) Promissory performance.

F) B) and E)
G) B) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A[n] _____________ contract is an agreement whereby the seller guarantees to sell everything she produces to one buyer.


A) Supply
B) Use
C) Requirement
D) Output
E) Arranged

F) B) and D)
G) A) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following consists of something of value given to another party in exchange for something else of value?


A) Consideration.
B) Acknowledgement.
C) Approval.
D) Discharge.
E) Accession.

F) B) and D)
G) B) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following would not be considered an example of consideration?


A) A promise to stay in a job until a particular project is completed.
B) A promise to your football coach to refrain from riding your motorcycle during football season even though you love riding it.
C) A promise to cook dinner for your roommate for the next six months.
D) A promise to stop drinking alcohol during exam week.
E) A promise to pay your employees as required by law.

F) D) and E)
G) B) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In the case of Smith v. Riley, referenced in the text, what did the court rule in regard to whether a purchase in the amount of "the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration" was sufficient consideration to support an agreement?


A) The Court ruled that the purchase amount was sufficient consideration.
B) The Court ruled that the purchase amount was insufficient consideration only because the sale of an interest in a lease was involved.
C) The Court ruled that the purchase amount was insufficient consideration only because a sale of goods was involved.
D) The Court ruled that the purchase amount was insufficient consideration only because a domestic partnership was involved.
E) The Court ruled that the purchase amount was insufficient consideration because over $50,000 was at issue.

F) B) and E)
G) A) and B)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In a bilateral contract, the consideration for a promise is a completed act.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following occurs when one party makes a promise knowing the other party will rely on it, the other party does rely on it, and the only way to avoid injustice is to enforce the promise?


A) Promissory agreement.
B) Promissory estoppel.
C) Quasi estoppel.
D) Quasi agreement.
E) Promissory performance.

F) C) and D)
G) B) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A[n] _____________ contract is an agreement whereby the buyer agrees to purchase all his goods from one seller.


A) Supply
B) Use
C) Requirement
D) Output
E) Arranged

F) A) and D)
G) All of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Define and discuss promissory estoppel, and give an example of when it would be applied.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Promissory estoppel occurs when one part...

View Answer

Which of the following is true regarding whether an accepted offer to satisfy a debt by paying only part is consideration?


A) Partial payment is consideration under all circumstances.
B) Partial payment is not consideration under any circumstances.
C) Partial payment is consideration if a liquidated debt is involved.
D) Partial payment is consideration if an unliquidated debt is involved.
E) Partial payment is consideration only if a liquidated or unliquidated debt is involved.

F) B) and C)
G) A) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In a[n] _____________ debt, the parties either dispute the fact that any money is owed or agree that some money is owed but dispute the amount.


A) Disputed
B) Unacknowledged
C) Uncertain
D) Liquidated
E) Unliquidated

F) B) and E)
G) B) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is true regarding illusory promises?


A) Illusory promises are not consideration.
B) Illusory promises are consideration.
C) Illusory promises qualify as consideration when past consideration is at issue.
D) Illusory promises qualify as consideration when promissory estoppel is at issue.
E) Illusory promises are consideration only when a sale of goods is involved.

F) C) and E)
G) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is true of an output contract under the UCC?


A) It is valid so long as the output is made in good faith.
B) It is valid so long as there is a writing setting forth the terms signed by the offeree.
C) It is valid so long as there is a writing setting forth the terms signed by the offeror and the offeree.
D) It is valid so long as more than nominal consideration is provided.
E) It is not valid because of the lack of consideration.

F) B) and C)
G) A) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is what a person will receive in return for performing a contractual obligation?


A) Consideration
B) Acknowledgement
C) Approval
D) Accord
E) Accession

F) A) and B)
G) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Sam offers Betty his bicycle for $75. Which of the following is an example of an illusory promise on the part of Betty?


A) "I'll take it."
B) "I'll take it if I decide to do so."
C) "I won't pay $75, but I will pay $50."
D) "I'll take it if you will let me try it out first and the brakes work well."
E) "I'll take it if you will buy new tires."

F) A) and B)
G) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Showing 21 - 40 of 69

Related Exams

Show Answer